Author Topic: KaSM  (Read 19835 times)

elvolcanoik

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #25 on: 21.10.2011, 18:48:03 »
Suvisi to spolu tym, ze tie fazy nasleduju po sebe, robit ich ale mozu aj dvaja rozni zamestnanci.

ale nemozu ich robit naraz?

niekedy ti napise ze moze este nieco ine robit okrem svojej aktualnej prace ... no zavisi to od toho co robi ... treba skusat

jardo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #26 on: 21.10.2011, 20:34:34 »
Suvisi to spolu tym, ze tie fazy nasleduju po sebe, robit ich ale mozu aj dvaja rozni zamestnanci.

ale nemozu ich robit naraz?

niekedy ti napise ze moze este nieco ine robit okrem svojej aktualnej prace ... no zavisi to od toho co robi ... treba skusat

myslel som to tak, ze tieto dve ulohy (system design a  modul design) ci sa daju robit naraz paralelne

Dulus

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
  • Electro Addict
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #27 on: 21.10.2011, 23:01:49 »
SystemDesign a ModuleDesign sa da robit paralelne, ale musi to robit kazde iny clovek v takom pripade. Jeden clovek vie robit naraz iba jednu vec v konkretnom case, jedinou vynimkou je review (akakolvek), tu vie robit aj popri inej praci.
Zivot je ako jazda na vytahu.Raz si hore,raz dole.

jardo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #28 on: 21.10.2011, 23:30:22 »
SystemDesign a ModuleDesign sa da robit paralelne, ale musi to robit kazde iny clovek v takom pripade. Jeden clovek vie robit naraz iba jednu vec v konkretnom case, jedinou vynimkou je review (akakolvek), tu vie robit aj popri inej praci.

no to viem ze len review sa da rbit s inymi ulohami, len som myslel ci na seba ttie dve ulohy nenadvezujej, ale ked sa daju robit sucasne tak asi nie

drtic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #29 on: 22.10.2011, 04:18:49 »
Uz so pisal, musi byt dokoncenych aspon 50%(tak je to v navode) z predoslej cinnosti, ktorej vysledkom je vzdy nejaky dokument. Prikaz, ktory ti zobrazi aktualny stav je: show me <nazov dokumentu>

romeo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #30 on: 25.10.2011, 14:40:30 »
nespomenul vcera na prednaske, ze buduci tyzden v pondelok nebude cviko ? Kedze nemame dekanske volno bars sa mi kvoli jednemu cviku do skoly nechce prist.

EDIT: ok, ina otazka, ide dakto na cviko dnes ?????
« Last Edit: 31.10.2011, 18:14:53 by romeo »
....in dreams until my death i will wander on ....

ropman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #31 on: 11.11.2011, 17:36:51 »
dokedy treba mat hotovu druhu simulaciu ?

romeo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #32 on: 15.11.2011, 02:44:37 »
Pretoze som pocul, ze malo z vas videl ten obrazok co len tak preklikal na prednaske, tak voala  ;)  :ropebanana: 

http://asiapac.com.au/images/THE_SOFTWARE_DEVELOPMENT_PROJECT.jpg

....in dreams until my death i will wander on ....

luigi39

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #33 on: 22.11.2011, 05:31:02 »
Je este niekto taky, co ma len neuspesnu simulaciu za sebou a nejde mu prihlasit do AMEISE??

pinderko

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #34 on: 22.11.2011, 05:41:12 »
no ja mam zatial neuspesne pokusy ale do systemu mi ide prihlasit...takze bud skus teraz alebo mozno davas chybne prihlasovacie udaje

luigi39

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #35 on: 22.11.2011, 16:00:51 »
Skusil som aj druheho clienta a tam pise ze zle prihlasovacie udaje ale treti client vypisuje ze nema spojenie

domino3d

  • Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #36 on: 23.11.2011, 02:20:40 »
ako zistim ze ci som uspel alebo nie?

Code: [Select]
The customer has tested the system carefully. Paul Koenig gives you a final statement about the project and the quality of the sofware produced. Delivery of the system was planned for 2012/07/08/08:00. The actual delivery was at 2012/07/20/08:00. This is a deviation of 12 days. The customer is not completely satisfied with the delivery date. Delivery took place 12 days too late. The customer had a number of disadvantages due to the late introduction of the new system. The actual costs for developing the system amounts to 251020.0 EUR. The planned costs amounted to 225000.0 EUR. This is a deviation of 26020.0 EUR. So, you exceeded the budget by 26020.0 EUR. Don't think that I am going to pay for your bad performance in the project. The functionality requested by the customer amounted to 200.88 Adjusted Function Points. The customer has found 196.88 Adjusted Function Points in the system. The code contains 9648 lines of code. The customer is very satisfied with the completeness of the code. The code contains 98.0092 percent of the functionality required by the customer. The customers requirements for the system were that it does not contain more than 12.0 errors per thousand lines of code. The actual delivered system contains 8.6 errors per thousand lines of code. The correctness of the system is excellent. The system contains 8.6 errors per thousand lines of code. These are 3.4 less than originally required by the customer. The customer has also asked for user documentation. The user manual comprises 257 pages. The user manual should cover 200.88 Adjusted Function Points, in fact, it describes a functionality that equals 194.44 Adjusted Function Points. The completeness of the user manual is excellent. 96.7953 of the required functionality is described in the manual. The correctness of the user manual required by the customer is 0.5 errors per page. The customer has found 0.2 errors per page. The correctness of the user manual is very good (0.2 per page). The user manual contains 0.3 errors per page less than specified. The customer rejects the product because you exceeded the budget to much. He is very upset. The project was stopped after 291 development days. The total effort for the system development reached 19.45 man months. The amount of the costs thereby incurred is 251020.0 EUR. The document Specification consists of 88 pages. It contains 198.2 AFP. Thereby 98.67 percent of the customer requirements are covered. The Specification still contains 49 errors. This is an average of 0.56 errors per page. The document Systemdesign consists of 86 pages. It contains 195.5 AFP. Thereby 97.32 percent of the customer requirements are covered. The Systemdesign still contains 63 errors. This is an average of 0.73 errors per page. The document Moduledesign consists of 127 pages. It contains 192.12 AFP. Thereby 95.64 percent of the customer requirements are covered. The Moduledesign still contains 100 errors. This is an average of 0.79 errors per page. The delivered code consists of 9648 lines of code. It contains 196.88 AFP. This means 98.01 percent of the system requirements are fullfilled. The code still contains 31 errors resulting from analysis, 10 errors resulting from system design, 13 errors resulting from module design and 29 errors resulting from implementation. This means 8.6 errors per 1000 lines of code. The document Manuals consists of 257 pages. It contains 194.44 AFP. Thereby 96.8 percent of the customer requirements are covered. The Manuals still contains 51 errors. This is an average of 0.2 errors per page. The effort distribution among the particular phases of the software development process is as follows: analysis and specification required 1.16 man months, for system design there were 4.63 man months needed, the implementation required 4.95 man months, the test 6.48 man months and the system documentation 2.22 man months. The reviews required an effort of 1.89 man months, the tests required 2.24 man months, the correction after review required 1.32 man months and the correction after test 4.24 man months. To develop the system you invested a total effort of 19.45 MM. In total you spent 12906.7 EUR per MM. The effort was distributed among the different development phases as follows: specification phase: 6.0 percent, design phase: 23.8 percent, coding phase: 25.5 percent, testing phase: 33.3 percent and documentation phase: 11.4 percent of total effort. Given the objectives as 100 percent and positive deviations (i.e. in case you performed better than required) with values greater than 100 and negative deviations with values less 100, respectively, compared to the customers's objectives you performed as follows: achievement of budget: 88.44 percent, achievement of deadline: 95.7 percent, achievement of functionality (compared to the objectives): 102.53 percent, achievement of functionality (compared to total functionality): 97.29 percent, achievement of quality (correctness): 144.31 percent. The customer has applied his scoring system to evaluate software systems delivered by external software houses. You have got 678 points for your project. You can reach a maximum of 1200 points. The simulation is finished. Please try again and start a new simulation. The simulation is finished. Please try again and start a new simulation.
vivat academicus

jardo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #37 on: 23.11.2011, 03:00:55 »
ako zistim ze ci som uspel alebo nie?

Code: [Select]
The customer has tested the system carefully. Paul Koenig gives you a final statement about the project and the quality of the sofware produced. Delivery of the system was planned for 2012/07/08/08:00. The actual delivery was at 2012/07/20/08:00. This is a deviation of 12 days. The customer is not completely satisfied with the delivery date. Delivery took place 12 days too late. The customer had a number of disadvantages due to the late introduction of the new system. The actual costs for developing the system amounts to 251020.0 EUR. The planned costs amounted to 225000.0 EUR. This is a deviation of 26020.0 EUR. So, you exceeded the budget by 26020.0 EUR. Don't think that I am going to pay for your bad performance in the project. The functionality requested by the customer amounted to 200.88 Adjusted Function Points. The customer has found 196.88 Adjusted Function Points in the system. The code contains 9648 lines of code. The customer is very satisfied with the completeness of the code. The code contains 98.0092 percent of the functionality required by the customer. The customers requirements for the system were that it does not contain more than 12.0 errors per thousand lines of code. The actual delivered system contains 8.6 errors per thousand lines of code. The correctness of the system is excellent. The system contains 8.6 errors per thousand lines of code. These are 3.4 less than originally required by the customer. The customer has also asked for user documentation. The user manual comprises 257 pages. The user manual should cover 200.88 Adjusted Function Points, in fact, it describes a functionality that equals 194.44 Adjusted Function Points. The completeness of the user manual is excellent. 96.7953 of the required functionality is described in the manual. The correctness of the user manual required by the customer is 0.5 errors per page. The customer has found 0.2 errors per page. The correctness of the user manual is very good (0.2 per page). The user manual contains 0.3 errors per page less than specified. The customer rejects the product because you exceeded the budget to much. He is very upset. The project was stopped after 291 development days. The total effort for the system development reached 19.45 man months. The amount of the costs thereby incurred is 251020.0 EUR. The document Specification consists of 88 pages. It contains 198.2 AFP. Thereby 98.67 percent of the customer requirements are covered. The Specification still contains 49 errors. This is an average of 0.56 errors per page. The document Systemdesign consists of 86 pages. It contains 195.5 AFP. Thereby 97.32 percent of the customer requirements are covered. The Systemdesign still contains 63 errors. This is an average of 0.73 errors per page. The document Moduledesign consists of 127 pages. It contains 192.12 AFP. Thereby 95.64 percent of the customer requirements are covered. The Moduledesign still contains 100 errors. This is an average of 0.79 errors per page. The delivered code consists of 9648 lines of code. It contains 196.88 AFP. This means 98.01 percent of the system requirements are fullfilled. The code still contains 31 errors resulting from analysis, 10 errors resulting from system design, 13 errors resulting from module design and 29 errors resulting from implementation. This means 8.6 errors per 1000 lines of code. The document Manuals consists of 257 pages. It contains 194.44 AFP. Thereby 96.8 percent of the customer requirements are covered. The Manuals still contains 51 errors. This is an average of 0.2 errors per page. The effort distribution among the particular phases of the software development process is as follows: analysis and specification required 1.16 man months, for system design there were 4.63 man months needed, the implementation required 4.95 man months, the test 6.48 man months and the system documentation 2.22 man months. The reviews required an effort of 1.89 man months, the tests required 2.24 man months, the correction after review required 1.32 man months and the correction after test 4.24 man months. To develop the system you invested a total effort of 19.45 MM. In total you spent 12906.7 EUR per MM. The effort was distributed among the different development phases as follows: specification phase: 6.0 percent, design phase: 23.8 percent, coding phase: 25.5 percent, testing phase: 33.3 percent and documentation phase: 11.4 percent of total effort. Given the objectives as 100 percent and positive deviations (i.e. in case you performed better than required) with values greater than 100 and negative deviations with values less 100, respectively, compared to the customers's objectives you performed as follows: achievement of budget: 88.44 percent, achievement of deadline: 95.7 percent, achievement of functionality (compared to the objectives): 102.53 percent, achievement of functionality (compared to total functionality): 97.29 percent, achievement of quality (correctness): 144.31 percent. The customer has applied his scoring system to evaluate software systems delivered by external software houses. You have got 678 points for your project. You can reach a maximum of 1200 points. The simulation is finished. Please try again and start a new simulation. The simulation is finished. Please try again and start a new simulation.

 The customer rejects the product, takze nie

domino3d

  • Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #38 on: 23.11.2011, 03:21:25 »
thanks

« Last Edit: 29.11.2011, 17:53:15 by Domino3D »
vivat academicus

Faust

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
  • -= Hybrid Terrorist =-
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #39 on: 30.11.2011, 17:03:24 »
trocha OT ale pre niekoho dolezita info: vcera (29.11.) mi po skonceni cvika Samuelis dal do ruky ciernobiely "zebrovity" zapisnik s tym ze si ho tam niekto zabudol, takze momentalne ho mam ja... komu chyba nech mi napise PM

MOD: podla mna to nie je OT
« Last Edit: 01.12.2011, 04:56:53 by Domino3D »
This is an invasion of PostHumus!

Stalker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #40 on: 01.12.2011, 03:21:13 »
faust, ten zapisnik takmer s istotou viem, ze nie je z nasej skupiny...
ASOT

slax

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #41 on: 13.12.2011, 23:21:40 »
som pocul taku informaciu, ze zo skusky je potrebne mat nadpolovicny pocet bodov aj ked mam zapocet napr. 40 bodov ... je to pravda? ... dufam ze nie :-/
« Last Edit: 14.12.2011, 00:05:01 by slax »

domino3d

  • Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #42 on: 13.12.2011, 23:25:16 »
caute, na skuske bude test, ci ako to bude prebiehat, nevravel nic?
vivat academicus

markus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #43 on: 13.12.2011, 23:34:58 »
na zaciatku spomínal moodle skusku ale v moodli su dajake otazky cize tazko povedat :D

radix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3506
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #44 on: 14.12.2011, 00:41:11 »
som pocul taku informaciu, ze zo skusky je potrebne mat nadpolovicny pocet bodov aj ked mam zapocet napr. 40 bodov ... je to pravda? ... dufam ze nie :-/
to uz ked zapocet bol taky tazky tak skusku chcem aspon na full :(

domino3d

  • Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #45 on: 14.12.2011, 03:52:19 »
ktora to je miestnost ta PK6_PC16 ?
vivat academicus

markus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #46 on: 14.12.2011, 04:43:26 »
sak PC16 v pc centre :D

jardo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 288
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #47 on: 14.12.2011, 04:58:23 »
sak PC16 v pc centre :D

on ale myslel, ze presne ktora miestnost to je, ci su tam kompy alebo nie

domino3d

  • Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #48 on: 14.12.2011, 17:35:45 »
sak PC16 v pc centre :D
on ale myslel, ze presne ktora miestnost to je, ci su tam kompy alebo nie
presne tak som to myslel , diki
takze ktora?
vivat academicus

markus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
    • View Profile
Re: KaSM
« Reply #49 on: 14.12.2011, 18:06:31 »
mari sa mi ze vlavej chodbe ta napravo s kompmi... ale stopro ti to nepoviem